Being prepared for mass, coastal and offshore oil spill recovery

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Email

Authorship

Ary van den Adel, Sales and Project Manager, Koseq B.V., Puttershoek, The Netherlands

Publication

During a mayor offshore oil spill, response teams are facing difficult challenges. Going out to the casualty as quickly as possible is vital, however, collecting the oil in order to minimize the environmental impact of the oil coming ashore is not an easy task. Boats normally carry oil containment booms and skimmers, mobilised from the various stock piles at response centers. When the spill is not too big, they might be able to get the oil booms around it to contain the oil. Response crews are often able to deploy the oil boom but face numerous difficulties maintaining the oil boom at sea in its required position due to currents, wind and wave action. Although it is already difficult to maintain an oil boom in rough sea conditions, it is even more difficult to get a large oil skimmer within the oil boom to collect the oil. Therefore, it is important to get to the scene with the right equipped offshore oil spill response vessels (OSR vessels) to avoid spreading of the oil spill.

The mere size of an oil spill marks the need for possessing large dedicated OSR vessels, equipped with high capacity remote operated vehicle (ROV) type skimmers and rigid sweeping arm systems, at stand-by at busy shipping lanes, touristic beach areas and offshore oil fields.

Previous oil spill recoveries

History has shown us that often after a mayor offshore oil spill disaster, national and local authorities commenced to build OSR vessels or contracted dedicated offshore OSR vessels, as their  existing vessels and equipment meant for inland incidents were not adequate to collect large amounts of oil at sea. After the oil spill incident in 1999 with the tanker Erika in France, the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA), provided funds to interested tanker and offshore vessel owners to equip their vessels with adequate offshore OSR equipment. Now EMSA has 19 vessels under contract and fitted out to their established standards. The contracted vessels continue their normal commercial business within a certain pre-fixed area and only once an oil spill occurs do they pick up their OSR equipment and proceed to the affected area to recover the spill.

The Spanish Government opted, after the incident with the Prestige tanker, in November 2002, to build four large offshore OSR and emergency towing vessels (ETV) and one OSR tanker. It was also demonstrated that Spain had not the right OSR vessels to combat such a mayor oil spill and had to get, amongst others, the assistance of the Dutch Coast Guard dedicated OSR vessel Arca, the Dutch suction trailing hopper dredger Rijndelta and the German coast guard vessel Neuwerk. These vessels showed their effectiveness to recover large quantities of oil from the ocean under severe weather conditions using the Koseq, rigid sweeping arm systems. Pumps mounted in the arms are of the hydraulically driven submersible Archimedes Screw type, having each rigid sweeping arm a pumping capacity of 350 cubic meters per hour.

The BP Montana oil field blow out, April 2010, in the Gulf of Mexico showed that a large number of dedicated vessels were required to cope with such a huge offshore oil spill. The light containment oil booms got washed ashore and the shrimp boats were not properly prepared to act as oil spill recovery vessels, although, having done a very good job to fish large quantities of the floating oil.

However, based on the success of using large vessels equipped with rigid sweeping arms in Europe, the US Coast Guard and BP requested that rigid sweeping arms were flown in from Holland to Texas and Louisiana to help with the Montana oil spill. The main difference between an oil boom and the rigid sweeping arms is that an oil boom has to contain the oil first, whereas, the rigid sweeping arm chases the oil, enabling the vessel to move through the oil and manoeuvre in such a way that the best optimum angle is reached to collect large volumes of oil from the water surface.

Koseq BV was able to airlift 16 to 15 meter long dismountable rigid sweeping arms and their corresponding hydraulic power units and ancillary equipment to Houston and New Orleans. T&T Marine Salvage Inc. of Galveston, Texas, who had purchased the rigid sweeping arms from Koseq BV. However, the corresponding handling cranes were not shipped as they require ship based crane pedestals, which were not feasible to install in such a short timeframe. Instead, T&T installed a mobile crane on each of the vessels to deploy and retrieve the rigid sweeping arms. Operating the arms by only one crane on a rolling vessel is not very safe to crew and equipment, and is also difficult to handle. After the first 16 rigid sweeping arms, T&T ordered six more arms which were transported by sea. All 22 of the 15 meter rigid sweeping arms and corresponding equipment are now in store in the US, stationed along the coasts at response centers, in Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi, ready to be use at any moment.

History shows over and over again that being prepared is not easy to accomplish when having to respond successfully to mayor offshore oil spills, however, the general public expect their communities and officials to be as prepared as fire brigades. Operating rigid sweeping arms, weighing 5000 kilograms from a supply boat, without the use of purpose built arm handling cranes, is not an easy task and minimizes the workability of the vessel.

To read the full article download PDF

Cookie Policy. This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.